Expanding the U.S. Power Grid

 Issue Briefing 

Transmission reform is an essential step toward embracing our clean energy future.

Clear Policy Ask: Policymakers should 1) make it easier to build new transmission lines and 2) improve existing grid efficiency.

  • U.S. House representatives should cosponsor legislation that improves and makes it easier to build transmission infrastructure, like the Clean Electricity and Transmission Acceleration Act of 2023.

    U.S. senators should cosponsor legislation that improves and makes it easier to build transmission infrastructure, like the SITE Act and the BIG WIRES Act.

    State utility regulators should incentivize better demand management and use of grid-enhancing technology from utilities.

    State legislators should urge the state’s utility commission to incentivize better demand management and grid modernization.

  • CETA: The Clean Electricity and Transmission Acceleration Act (CETA), introduced by Reps. Mike Levin (D-CA) and Sean Casten (D-IL) and backed by the House Sustainable Energy and Environment Coalition, proposes a number of reforms to help expand our electric grid. Here are just a few:

    • Reforms to help streamline the transmission permitting process

    • Promotes the use of grid-enhancing technologies

    • Allocates costs of transmission proportionally to who is benefitting from it

    • Establishes a transmission tax credit to incentivize development

    • Gives the federal government primary siting authority over transmission lines of 1000 MW or greater

    • Improves interregional transmission planning and requires a minimum transfer capability of 30% of peak load (the largest amount of demand a utility experiences in a given day)

    SITE Act: The Senate version of the SITE Act, introduced by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), gives the federal government siting authority over interstate transmission lines and empowers it to use eminent domain to site new lines, with protections for landowners.

    BIG WIRES: The BIG WIRES Act, introduced by Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-CO), complements the SITE Act by imposing a minimum transfer capability of 30% of peak load, at no cost to the federal government.

The outdated U.S. electric grid cannot support an economy powered by renewable energy.

The U.S. power grid is outdated. Interstate power lines carry less electricity than technologically possible, and to fewer places, because infrastructure lags behind our electricity needs. The movement of electricity through the power grid over long distances is called transmission. Reforming our country’s transmission policy would make it easier to build more grid infrastructure, which would add capacity to the grid and make it more interconnected.

Why do we need to add capacity to the U.S. electric grid? Demand for electricity is increasing and the current grid structure cannot support the expected electrification of enormous swaths of our economy as we try to rapidly decarbonize. Electricity demand also naturally increases each year as a byproduct of tech-heavy economic growth. There’s already more clean energy waiting to connect to the U.S. power grid than the total generation capacity of existing power plants. Grid capacity isn’t the only reason for that backlog, but the grid simply can’t handle that excess generation without expansion and modernization. (Check out interconnection.fyi for a live visualization of all the pending interconnection requests!).

To add to the complexity, the grid is not just a single network of power lines but a patchwork of regulatory “planning regions.” Each planning region has its own electricity markets and distinct regulators. This fragmentation causes inefficiencies, wasted energy, and higher utility costs for consumers. Building more interregional transmission lines improves the frequency, speed, and efficiency with which electricity is transported between states and planning regions.

Desired outcomes of expanding the U.S. power grid

Reliability: If a heat wave or freeze hits one region unexpectedly, utility companies can avoid rolling blackouts by importing electricity from a nearby region. Improving interregional transmission provides more balance and reliability nationwide.

Balance: If present trends continue, there will be a major shift toward solar and wind generation as a larger percentage of our energy mix. This is of course good for decarbonization, but solar and wind power is concentrated in certain geographies, and neither one can generate electricity continuously. Interregional transmission helps efficiently distribute that electricity to balance the grid and reduce the need for power generated by fossil fuels. Without adequate transmission, surplus solar and wind generation ends up going to waste, and regions without adequate solar and wind generation need to rely more on fossil fuels.

Cost savings: The ability to transfer electricity between regions lowers costs for ratepayers because it increases the total supply of electricity that each home or business can access and smoothes demand spikes (think about how much an Uber costs during a rainy rush hour vs. mid-afternoon on a sunny Sunday). As long as that supply is priced efficiently, it has a downward pressure on price.

Opportunities for transmission reform

Congress can pass federal laws that address key issues affecting building new transmission, like requiring transferability between regions, making it easier to permit new lines, and granting more regulatory authority to the federal government.

State utility regulators can use their regulatory authority over electric utilities to improve how they use existing transmission lines. They can incentivize practices that reduce grid stress, like the use of grid-enhancing technologies or better demand management.

State governments can tighten requirements on utility regulators and approve transmission siting and permitting requests quickly.

STOP! You now know enough about transmission reform to take meaningful action.

Curious about this climate solution and want to learn more? Cool, keep scrolling!

Quick Frames

We each approach the climate crisis through a different lens and with different motivators. The decision-makers we want to persuade are also motivated by different framings of the same issue! Facts are facts, but it can be helpful to frame them differently to match those individual lenses.

Here are some common frames that speak to different perspectives:

  • 🇺🇸 BIPARTISAN POTENTIAL: While transmission reform will indeed help facilitate a nationwide transition to a renewable energy economy, the infrastructure of the U.S. power grid itself is technology-neutral. Expanding the power grid improves efficiency, reliability, and cost-saving benefits no matter what type of fuel is generating electricity.

  • 💡 RAPID DECARBONIZATION: Without increased transmission capacity, it will be difficult to transition to a 100% clean power grid. Battery storage alone is not enough to adequately and efficiently balance a grid with significant solar and wind generation, we need to add total capacity and improve interregional transmission across the entire U.S. power grid.

  • ♥️ HUMAN HEALTH: Fossil fuels may cause over 350,000 premature deaths in the U.S. per year. Expanding the U.S. power grid helps us reduce reliance on fossil fuels, especially the dirtiest “peaker” plants, which are dispatched when electricity demand peaks and a region quickly needs more energy.

  • ✊ EQUITY AND JUSTICE: Underserved and disadvantaged communities are more likely to suffer adverse effects of living near the dirtiest fossil power plants, and transmission helps reduce our need for fossil fuel generation.

  • 💰 COST SAVINGS: Increased transmission creates efficiency in power markets, lowering utility costs for consumers. One estimate shows an annual savings of $300 per household on electricity bills with added transmission.

Wonky details ahead!

Wonky details ahead!

(you can handle it)

Slow transmission growth hinders decarbonization.

Some modeling of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) shows that the law’s emissions reduction potential is dependent on building more transmission.

The REPEAT Project based at Princeton University estimates that our current rate of transmission buildout—about 1% of added capacity per year—will need to double through 2030. The increased demand for electricity is largely spurred by 1) other provisions of the IRA, such as incentivizing electric cars and heating systems, plus 2) the additional demand that comes with economic growth, especially during a tech boom that uses energy-intensive data centers.

If transmission cannot be expanded faster than 1% per year, we risk having to generate over 110 million additional tons of coal-fired energy by 2030 to meet additional electricity demand. Even if we increase that rate by 50%, according to the model, we’ll sacrifice 200 million tons of potential emissions reduction in that timeframe. That’s equivalent to the emissions from 47 million gas-powered vehicles in a year.

According to this model, continuing at our current pace of transmission buildout means we’ll miss out on 80% of the IRA’s emissions reduction potential. Remember that the IRA is our country’s landmark climate law. It was years in the making and required very specific political conditions to pass (and actually defeated the odds). There’s no plan B for drawing down CO2 emissions on a national scale—the IRA needs to do its job.

Below are the projected emissions reductions in various transmission constraint scenarios as modeled by the REPEAT Project (September 2022):

One reason behind the REPEAT Project’s findings is that existing interregional transmission capacity is inadequate, as discussed in the first section of this briefing. The below map from a 2022 Niskanen Center report helps visualize where the worst bottlenecks are.

The map contextualizes the energy crisis in Texas that dominated headlines in 2021 after Winter Storm Uri knocked out most of the state’s grid. Critics of Texas’ grid operator were quick to cite regulatory failures that could have been avoided with more robust transmission planning and interconnectivity. But a closer look at this map shows that ERCOT isn’t the only planning region with a transmission capacity of less than 5% of peak load. PJM, the largest grid operator in the country, has only 1-3% transmission capacity with neighboring grid operators in the nation’s most congested corridor. And with a single exception in the Mountain West, the other planning regions don’t fare much better, leaving them vulnerable to extreme weather events and less equipped to efficiently balance renewable energy generation.

What are the barriers to building more interregional transmission?

State siting jurisdiction: Unlike for natural gas pipelines, where the federal government can decide that a new interstate pipeline is in the public interest and site the line (using eminent domain if necessary,) the federal government does not have this authority with respect to electric transmission lines. Because most transmission lines cross state borders, that means every state the line crosses has an opportunity to veto the project—and that’s often what happens. State officials are influenced by public backlash against projects that is sometimes organic and sometimes organized by advocacy groups.

Permitting: Once transmission lines are sited, they need permits. Transmission infrastructure is usually subjected to environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The law requires labor-intensive environmental data assessment and allows the opportunity for opposition groups to sue developers, a process that often takes years.

Public understanding: During both stages of the process, siting and permitting, a lack of public understanding is often a barrier. Engaging with the local community at earlier stages can help projects succeed, helping insulate against public susceptibility to misinformation and anti-transmission lobbying campaigns. Especially in cases where the affected community is historically disadvantaged, early engagement can also help hold developers accountable for ensuring the project delivers local benefits.

FAQ

  • The customizable email templates in every Climate Changemakers Action Playbook are designed to be politically neutral.

    That said, we always highly recommend adding your own personalization to the templates. This may mean replacing some of the arguments with compelling benefits that are better suited to your area’s demographics.

    In general, use a word like “pollution” rather than “climate change” or “decarbonization,” and focus on economic benefits.

    Additionally, every Issue Briefing has a “Quick Frames” section that can help you focus your argument through the most appropriate lens. For conservatives, those will often be “cost savings” or “job creation.” Some conservative policymakers also respond well to arguments about environmental conservation (as distinct from anything related to greenhouse gas emissions).

  • We can’t be sure!

    What we do know is that transmission infrastructure is essential to a future power grid that draws most of its electricity from renewables. For some forms of clean energy, like wind, we have no choice but to expand our transmission lines.

    It’s our bet that new transmission will disproportionately benefit clean sources over fossil fuels because the catalytic incentives in the IRA, and even the status quo market trends, make clean generation the economically smart choice in a growing proportion of the country.

    The upside of transmission being technologically neutral is that it’s easier to message to elected officials who may not be on board yet with the idea of “an energy transition.” The fundamental goal of transmission reform is to make electricity cheaper and more reliable for everyone, and most officials support that.

  • What a wonderful problem to have!

    Try reframing your message with specific reference to their supportive actions, thanking them for their leadership, then push them to do even more. There is always room to do more.

    Yoa can also ask if there's anything you can do as a constituent to help them get things across the finish line!

    Separately from your message to policymakers, you can also spend your valuable action-taking time recruiting friends in other congressional districts to get in on this action. If you’re asking a friend to follow in your footsteps and contact a specific decision-maker, consider making it super easy for them by editing the email template on their behalf, then sending it to them to transmit. See the Action Plan webpage and the last step of every Action Playbook for more information and resources about activating your network!

Social Media Post Example

⬇️ Tailor this message to your preferred
social media platform:

Our power grid won’t be able to handle the huge surge in electricity demand that's right around the corner. We need a smarter, bolder electricity transmission policy to help support our clean energy future. [@ MEMBERS OF CONGRESS] please support legislation to improve and expand the U.S. power grid!

© 2024 Climate Changemakers